Wolfstar
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!Wolfstar is a public relations consultancy offering expert counsel in public relations, social media and word of mouth marketing and communications. We meet your PR needs for today, tomorrow and... [Read more...]
Social Media
Wolfstar is a social media consultancy and digital marketing communication specialist providing everything from blogger relations and buzz monitoring to online community management and moderation. Online people are already talking about your brand so we help you to listen, understand... [Read more...]
Public Relations
Wolfstar is UK-based public relations consultancy run by award-winning PR consultants. We provide strategic corporate communications counsel and deliver successful tactical PR campaigns including media relations, online PR, crisis communications, stakeholder relations, product... [Read more...]
Word of Mouth
Just 14% of consumers believe your advertising. Most would prefer to talk to and trust a friend or peer. People are already talking about your brand – saying good things, and bad. Just imagine if you could join in these conversations. Wolfstar starts by listening, understanding... [Read more...]
Public Affairs
In a world that is increasingly networked, online communities are becoming ever more important in the formation of public policy. Wolfstar offers considerable traditional public affairs, campaigning and lobbying experience, which, when married to our online and digital expertise... [Read more...]
Marketing
A good strong brand is far more than just a logo – it is the embodiment of your corporate personality and DNA. We help our clients to develop a brand that works effectively and then we help them to produce well-executed marketing collateral including brochures, magazines, websites... [Read more...]
Social Media Newsroom
News from our social media newsroom
Industry news from our delicious feed
you might be interested in…
Latest post from the Wolfstar blog
Olympics in London 2012, no thanks to LOCOG
Now we’ve marvelled at the spectacular closing ceremony for Beijing 2008 we can all start focusing on the Olympics for London 2012. But a post by Neville Hobson has made me wonder if LOCOG (London Organising Committee) will really be able to cope with the fundamental shifts in society that are occurring. By 2012 change will have accelerated even further.
Neville has used the London 2012 logo on his blog, even explaining “I couldn’t find a logo file for download from the image library or anywhere else on the 2012 website. What’s at the top of this page is a screen capture from the 2012 home page.”
The reason Neville couldn’t find the logo in the image library is that he’s breaking the law by using it. The draconian LOCOG ‘Using the Brand’ guidelines make it clear that:
“For example, without the London 2012 Organising Committee’s written consent, it is unlawful to use the Olympic symbol, the London 2012 logo or the mark ‘London 2012’ in the course of trade.”
Neville’s blog is definitely used in “the course of trade”. But wait, the guidelines also say:
“The words protected by OSPA can, however, be used in editorial news pieces without our authorisation and journalists are, in certain circumstances, able to use our emblem etc to illustrate an editorial piece about the Games.”
You could easily argue that Neville’s blog is an “editorial news piece.” Unfortunately, LOCOG also say:
“This exception does not however apply to businesses which produce newsletters, client bulletins or other marketing collateral.”
But that’s very wooly wording. I’ve produced lots of newsletters for clients that I would argue are nothing to do with ‘marketing’ and it clearly says “other marketing collateral” therefore implying the first part of the sentence only applies to marketing newsletters.
What you are allowed to do is use this logo to “Link to the London 2012 website.” But it’s hidden right at the end of some very long and dull FAQs. Don’t bother following the link as it just takes you to a bunch of rather pointless, brightly coloured text boxes.
The site also has links to a series of big PDF documents detailing all the different ways that you aren’t allowed to do anything to support London 2012.
I fully understand and agree with the need to protect the sponsorship and investment in the 2012 games, but this is not the way to do it. It is 1995 thinking (The Olympic Symbol etc. (Protection) Act 1995 (OSPA)), added to in 2006 (London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Act 2006) by people who don’t understand how society is changing. Personally I can’t see this old school ‘command and control’ dictatorship lasting until 2012.
This is not the way to motivate the nation to get behind 2012 (and at the moment the whole nation is not behind it, many questioning the expense and the disproportionate focus on London, ignoring most of the UK.) Can you just begin to imagine the damage to the 2012 image as LOCOG brings the full force of its legal might down on a tiny local business or community group that is just trying to support its local sporting heroes?
The intelligent solution would surely to have two versions of the London 2012 logo – one for official sponsors and one for enthusiastic supporters.
UPDATE: I wrote most of this post last night, but didn’t post it. There is already a comment about this and Neville’s response on the post.
